COGNITIVE AND LINGUISTIC FACTORS INFLUENCING IDIOM COMPREHENSION IN EFL LEARNERS

Authors

  • Islamova Ramila Shukhrat qizi Master’s Student, Department of Foreign Languages and Literature, UNIVERSITY OF EXACT AND SOCIAL SCIENSES, Uzbekistan Author

Keywords:

idiom comprehension, cognitive factors, linguistic factors, EFL learners, figurative language

Abstract

Idiomatic expressions constitute an essential part of natural language use; however, they remain one of the most challenging aspects of second language acquisition. This article investigates the cognitive and linguistic factors influencing idiom comprehension among learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Drawing on psycholinguistic and cognitive linguistic theories, the study examines how working memory, conceptual metaphor awareness, language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge, idiom transparency, and first language transfer affect learners’ ability to interpret English idioms. The analysis reveals that idiom comprehension is a multifaceted process shaped by the interaction of cognitive capacities and linguistic competence. The findings suggest that linguistic proficiency and metaphor awareness play a particularly significant role in successful idiom processing. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for improving idiom instruction in EFL contexts.

References

1. Abel, B. (2003). English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach. Second Language Research, 19(4), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658303sr226oa

2. Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.553

3. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: More than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168806072460

4. Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90014-9

5. Cooper, T. C. (1999). Processing of idioms by L2 learners of English. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587719

6. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.

7. Gibbs, R. W. (2001). Proverbial themes we live by. Poetics, 29(3), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(01)00041-9

8. Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford University Press.

9. Kecskes, I. (2006). On my mind: Thoughts about salience, context, and figurative language from a second language perspective. Second Language Research, 22(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr266oa

10. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

11. Liontas, J. I. (2002). Exploring second language learners’ notions of idiomaticity. System, 30(3), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00014-1

12. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

13. Nippold, M. A., & Taylor, C. L. (2002). Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: A comparison of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(2), 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/030)

14. Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1655–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00008-9

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31