DEVELOPING PRAGMATIC COMPETENCE IN ACADEMIC DISCUSSIONS (IN THE EXAMPLE OF 10th -11th GRADES)

Authors

  • Eshbo‘riyeva Aziza Muhiddinovna Author

Keywords:

Pragmatic competence; academic discussions; communicative competence; English as a Foreign Language (EFL); secondary school education; discourse strategies; turn-taking; classroom interaction; 10th and 11th-grade learners; pragmatic instruction

Abstract

The development of pragmatic competence—the ability to use language effectively in context—is a critical aspect of communicative proficiency in academic settings. This article explores how 10th and 11th-grade students develop pragmatic competence through structured academic discussions in English language classrooms. Focusing on key pragmatic functions such as turn-taking, hedging, requesting clarification, and expressing agreement or disagreement, the study investigates how these skills can be taught, measured, and fostered in real classroom settings. The research draws on both qualitative and quantitative data gathered from classroom observations, student interviews, and discourse analysis. The findings indicate that explicit instruction, collaborative learning strategies, and authentic discussion tasks significantly enhance students’ ability to navigate academic discourse pragmatically. Moreover, the study identifies challenges students face in managing politeness, appropriateness, and contextually sensitive expressions in discussions. The article concludes with pedagogical recommendations for integrating pragmatic awareness into secondary school curricula to better prepare students for academic success and intercultural communication. This study contributes to a growing body of research advocating for a more nuanced and practical approach to teaching language functions beyond grammar and vocabulary.                   

References

1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

2. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.

3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatics and Language Learning, 9, 23–43.

4. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

5. Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Pearson Education.

6. Jalolov, J. (2021). Integrating pragmatics into Uzbek EFL curriculum: Challenges and perspectives. Uzbek Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 45–59.

7. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell Publishing.

8. Nguyen, M. T., Pham, T. N., & Pham, H. L. (2019). Enhancing pragmatic competence in high school EFL learners: An intervention study. Language Teaching Research, 23(3), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817729747

9. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

10. Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018

11. Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91

12. Zarei, A. A., & Mohseni, F. (2014). The effects of explicit teaching of discourse markers on EFL learners’ writing performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1256–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.543

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10